Geolocation technology plays a crucial role in the online gaming industry, ensuring that players are in regions where online gambling is legal and regulated. In a notable case, Xpoint was accused of patent infringement by GeoComply over a geolocation engine created by GeoComply’s CEO, Anna Sainsbury. The legal battle has captured the attention of the gaming world, especially following Xpoint’s recent victory in the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Patent infringement case
GeoComply claimed that Xpoint had infringed upon its patented geolocation technology, alleging that Xpoint’s software replicated a “geolocation engine” it had developed. This technology is central to GeoComply’s offerings, allowing operators to verify the location of players with high accuracy.
In response, Xpoint dismissed the claims as meritless, asserting that its own technology did not infringe on GeoComply’s intellectual property. Xpoint argued that GeoComply was attempting to monopolise the geolocation market by blocking competition through legal channels.
Court rulings and decisions
Initially, the district court dismissed GeoComply’s claims, finding insufficient grounds to prove patent infringement. The court sided with Xpoint, stating that GeoComply’s patent did not cover the entirety of geolocation technology as a concept. When GeoComply appealed, the Federal Circuit Court upheld the district court’s decision, reaffirming that Xpoint’s operations did not violate GeoComply’s patent. This ruling has set a powerful precedent, reinforcing the idea that core geolocation technology cannot be monopolised.
Statements from both companies
Following the ruling, Xpoint released a statement highlighting its commitment to fair competition and innovation within the industry. Xpoint’s statement emphasised its dedication to advancing geolocation services and enhancing choice for gaming operators.
Official statement released by Xpoint, said, “We are pleased the court has ruled in our favor, affirming what we have maintained from the start. Xpoint has conducted its business legally and appropriately, and GeoComply has attempted to restrict competition through a patent that is invalid under US law. Both the District Court and now the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have held that GeoComply’s patent infringement allegations against Xpoint are meritless. The decision means that Xpoint can continue to operate and innovate freely in the geolocation technology space.?
“Furthermore, the invalidation of GeoComply’s patent shows that no company can monopolise vital geolocation technology services and force their clients to work with them. Xpoint will vigorously pursue opportunities to create choice for gaming operators and improve the health of the industry. Xpoint’s victory demonstrates its commitment to an open, competitive market that drives forward the capabilities of geolocation technology for the entire gaming industry. With this ruling, Xpoint is excited to continue our momentum and deliver leading-edge solutions across the sector.”?
GeoComply expressed disappointment in the ruling but maintained its commitment to providing cutting-edge geolocation services. The company defended its decision to pursue legal action to protect its intellectual property.
GeoComply also released a statement, stating: “Throughout this legal process, our commitment to serving our customers and delivering innovative solutions has remained as strong as ever. Our cutting-edge suite of solutions has never been about a single patent; they are the result of our decade-plus experience, the expertise of our team, and our unrelenting focus on customer success. This innovation is demonstrated through GeoComply’s proven track record of service delivery, reliability, and scalability. Our industry-leading platform processes over 1.2 billion transactions per month in a dynamic, context-aware system logic, all while consistently maintaining over 99.99% uptime and achieving over 99% pass rates. Our focus on creating and delivering industry-leading geolocation compliance and anti-fraud technology continues to drive us forward.
“We are disappointed by the court decisions related to patent law technicalities, and while we respect the judicial process, we stand firm in our belief that this specific innovation within our groundbreaking technology deserves protection from improper infringement. GeoComply remains committed to promoting competition while still protecting our broad intellectual property rights.”
As more jurisdictions legalise online gambling, dependable geolocation technology becomes increasingly crucial. Patent disputes are common in emerging tech fields like geolocation. However, this ruling suggests courts may lean towards promoting competition over monopolising essential technologies.
Subscribe?here?to SiGMA’s?Top 10 News countdown?and?SiGMA’s Weekly Newsletter?to stay up to date with all the latest iGaming News, and benefit from Subscriber-Only Offers.?
